That grass looks really good, as do the flowers. The DOF also adds a nice touch to it. The tree probably isn't as great, I think because it looks a bit low poly *edit* Even though it clearly isn't *end edit*. The texture on it looks good, I think it's just how the branches poke out a bit unrealisticly. Also, maybe you should scatter some leaves around on the ground for extra realism. Great work though. The hill looks great for rolling down.

---

[Link to www.3dprevis.com]

I know what you mean about the tree, I am using treestorm as I dont have a copy of speedtree. I think thats why it looks crap.

---

Please support us and post a [Link to www.digitalartsfront.com] on your website.

--Matt

Crap's probably too strong a word, it's just that the grass, and flowers look really good and the tree only looks ok. Maybe try easynat. It might be slightly better and it's still free.

---

[Link to www.3dprevis.com]

Or model one. Theres a challenge idea. trees are pretty tough. Nice image but I think there would be some depth of field on the background aswell or at least some atmospheric haze. plus a close up flower blurred but still clearly a flower. seems a waste to have such a nice high res model and not show it in the foreground.

---

Thanks for the tips Tyson. I'll try a take 2.

---

Please support us and post a [Link to www.digitalartsfront.com] on your website.

--Matt